♠ | A T 2 |
---|---|
♥ | A 8 7 6 5 2 |
♦ | Q 7 4 3 |
♣ | - |
Well? Are you gonna do it? Does your partner agree?
Assuming you've voted I can get on with the story. If not then wave your eyes back up there and make a decision!
Whether it's correct or not I passed. The hand is two playable in other denominations for a weak two (not to mention the suit quality). I could open one but I'd need to get the bucket if partner responds 2♣.
Then the auction got exciting:
West | North | East | South |
Pass! | 3NT* | Pass | 4♣ |
Second to act opened a gambling 3NT which his partner pulled. Presumably that meant they were wide open in a suit and that must mean we have a contract!
Not wanting to punish partner for making the wrong choice holding 4-4 or 5-4 in the majors I bid:
West | North | East | South |
Pass | 3NT | Pass | 4♣ |
4♥ | 5♣ | X | End |
If you guessed at the layout you probably didn't guess this...
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
North (following the system card) was of the opinion that 3NT showed a minor preempt. My partner had been enjoying herself wondering which minor North thought was solid. We'll never know if she would have pulled to 5♦ had North passed but double was worth +500 and 1 imp (crossed against 8 other tables).
This was an interesting hand. I'm interested to see I'm the first vote for pass!
ReplyDeleteI did actually open 1H at the table but I'm not convinced it's best, I agree with your point about having three possible strains and a poor suit. I'm very wary about opening a "weak two" with two aces, it's a lot more defence that partner is likely to expect.
We got to 5D, making 7 when a club was led (SA entry to established hearts).
Is 6D a contract worth being in?
1H, easy. Excellent offensive strength; too much to pass IMO. 2H is ridiculous - three first round controls is absolutely not a weak hand. I'd rather open 4
ReplyDelete